Risk assessment: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Risk is the combination of the likelihood and the severity of an incident. A situation could be both unlikely but fatal, highly likely but not cause any injury, and everything in between. Evaluating both axes accurately requires attention to details and knowledge of all factors in the scene.
Risk is the combination of the likelihood and the severity of an incident. A situation could be both unlikely but fatal, highly likely but not cause any injury, or something in between. Evaluating both aspects requires attention to details and knowledge of all factors in the situation. Individuals may reach different conclusions based on their personal experiences. Participants must ultimately decide their own risk acceptance levels based on the facts and their trust in other participants.


== Risk matrix ==
== Risk matrix ==
Line 91: Line 91:
|}
|}


 
Per NASA methodology, the estimated probability of occurrence informs the likelihood categorization. However this is difficult to assess for kink activities because of the lack of data. It is the responsibility of participants to determine the probabilities of the activities being assessed using their experience.
Per NASA's methodology, the estimated probability of occurrence informs the likelihood categorization. However this is difficult to assess for kink activities because of the lack of data. It is the responsibility of participants to determine the probabilities of the activities being assessed using their experience.


Consider a hypothetical scene where a participant is suspended in a full body harness. Using general utility carabiners not rated for loads to support the suspended participant would have a higher likelihood of failure than a double bolt snap, which in turn have a higher likelihood of failure than a climbing carabiner with a high strength rating. Conversely, using general utility carabiners with simple squeeze gates for limb-only supports could enable faster release times than attachment devices requiring keyed or threaded unlocks.
Consider a hypothetical scene where a participant is suspended in a full body harness. Using general utility carabiners not rated for loads to support the suspended participant would have a higher likelihood of failure than a double bolt snap, which in turn have a higher likelihood of failure than a climbing carabiner with a high strength rating. Conversely, using general utility carabiners with simple squeeze gates for limb-only supports could enable faster release times than attachment devices requiring keyed or threaded unlocks.
Line 99: Line 98:
Most media do not depict the reality of scenes. Artistic license is often taken to frame and describe a scene in a way that appears to be more extreme than it actually is for the purpose of appealing to the audience's fantasies. In reality a responsible scene should have people off-camera, communication between participants, and safety equipment that is not visible to the viewer.
Most media do not depict the reality of scenes. Artistic license is often taken to frame and describe a scene in a way that appears to be more extreme than it actually is for the purpose of appealing to the audience's fantasies. In reality a responsible scene should have people off-camera, communication between participants, and safety equipment that is not visible to the viewer.


There isn't an inherent problem in portraying a scene in a performative manner; it is a form of creative expression. However, it is important to remember when creating a scene that media is not a good benchmark. Precautions must be taken to ensure safety above all else.
There is not an inherent problem in portraying a scene in a performative manner; it is a form of creative expression. However, it is important to remember when creating a scene that media is not a good benchmark. Precautions must be taken to ensure safety above all else.


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />